We are constantly focusing and refocusing our activities. I mentioned that, I think, already. We've already refocused our activities to things that we can do with the resources we have.
Does that mean we should change the mandate? That would be acting too soon because perhaps in the future we'll have more resources and maybe we wouldn't want to let drop aspects of the mandate simply because we can't realize those total objectives in exactly the same way now as we could 10 years ago because we had more resources.
I think the people who created the foundation had the intention that it maintain its vision and direction over a long period of time, and that yes, with time, our resources would expand and contract, and we would have to direct our attention to what we consider to be the greatest priorities. I guess that's what we're doing presently.