I knew this was coming and that's why I was trying to work my way around this.
Let's go with the January 15 timeframe. I went with that because I can't imagine we will be looking at a draft report before then. If everything comes together, we won't need to go there. It takes us into a new policy area. It looks like an area that we're going to have to talk about, given other discussions. But for now, I don't think it's reasonable for the committee to shut down its own ability to study this and leave it open-ended as to when this information is coming. That's why I built in a reasonable length of time and a procedure for Mr. Friedman.
Now, if we get information from Mr. Friedman that suggests it may take longer, I will make sure the committee is seized of that to decide how they want to move forward and whether or not they're going to wait for it.
I don't expect those at the end of the table to understand what we're talking about. It's internal stuff related to other report writing.
The key thing for you, Mr. Friedman, is if you could get us that information by January 30 next year, you would be helping us a lot.