Ms. Cheng, because there are these exemptions in terms of the reporting, does your office actually conduct some sort of analysis or audit to ensure that while they are exempt from public publication, they are indeed that for which they have been reported or suggested, and that you can verify that? For example, there's a broad category for non-disclosure resulting from confidentiality agreements. It's tough to establish a rules process under which something would constitute a just confidentiality agreement versus having what might be a discretionary decision to establish a confidentiality agreement. One of the things we are always concerned about is that a confidentiality agreement not be entered into simply to provide a means of cover.
Does your office provide any analysis of that, based on the specific categories of exemption from publication? Do you cover that within your audits?