Thank you very much.
In another connection, in response to one of the recommendations in the report, Industry Canada replies that it accepts the recommendation and that it will continue the exemplary practice it implemented in 2010, which consists in including in its contribution agreements specific project objectives as well as the expected benefit outcomes.
I wonder why they reply that they accept that recommendation, but specify that they will continue to do what they have been doing since 2010. Does that reply really cover everything you had included in the recommendation?