The Auditor General is bound to look at the facts of what our files and documentation reflect at any given point in time to the extent that we make improvements, as we continue to do, and as we do as good administrators of our programs, for example, publishing the performance measurement strategy, which is quite comprehensive. It wasn't an undertaking we made in respect to this audit. It was something we were going to do in and of itself for good reason. But when they come back and check in with us in a number of years, and I'm certain they will be back, they will be able to reflect on how well we've implemented that to the extent that we've reported.... I assume they'll have to talk about something else next time when they do their report on us. That's what we'd hoped to do.
I take a lot of credit in the sense that there's one paragraph in the report that is quite key, which is not all the areas where we need to improve, but it's that the core operation of the program, the way we determine eligibility, the due diligence, that we actually pay claims appropriately, that we collect the funds, that sort of beating heart of what we do, they found us to have done a good job.