That's a very good question.
We do analyses that look at.... Let's say, for example, it's a major change in tax policy, a reduction in taxes, an increase in taxes, or something major like that in personal income tax or corporate income tax. We have these general accrual models that look at the economic impact that we should expect from these measures. We use those to inform and advise a minister on what could be the potential economic impact of those measures.
We often compartmentalize them and benchmark them. If you have one dollar to spend, where do you spend the dollar? Where will you get the biggest bang for your buck?
When we do the projections, we are prudent. We don't integrate the dynamic scoring that would make these things even more sustainable than they really potentially could be. We are prudent. We don't factor that in.
Now, if there's a major change in policy, such as a tax or tariff that goes the other way and that could reduce economic activity and lead to less revenue, we may consider integrating these impacts into our analysis.
So it's somewhat asymmetric and prudent to make sure that our projections will turn out to be on track or better.