We can do that.
In terms of consistency, in the past this has been controversial as to whether or not we're going to go in camera to do other business, adjourn, or create a new rotation. We can do it. It just takes a majority of the committee.
But I do want to mention to the government that they're initiating this. Normally, when we do extensions, it's because there have been a lot of difficult, complex questions, the answers weren't able to come out in the five minutes we have, so people are anxious, and it's clear to the public that a lot more issues are there to be raised. It makes all the sense in the world. I'm just pointing out that this wasn't this kind of rotational discussion, and therefore the government is setting a bit of a precedent that the opposition will be entitled to in the future without necessarily having to make the case that there's justification, just a desire.
I say that as a precautionary note, but the motion is in order.
We have a motion that we do one more round, one from each caucus.
Is there any debate?
Mr. Allen.