Thank you very much, Mr. Guimont.
One of the issues that was flagged for me is that a parliamentary committee receives a two-page action plan so that Parliament can hold the government to account on a critical issue like cyber-security. But what has been issued by the department for public consumption was—I assume as a communications method—a more comprehensive action plan, and the two don't seem to mesh for me.
What's tabled here is an item of record before a parliamentary committee, but what you're telling us is that you produced a much more comprehensive action plan that was not tabled before Parliament. Still, we're supposed to hold you to that standard. Is that correct?