If I understand the language, I think it means not being entirely literal about the text of the agreement and what the lawyers will tell you is the narrow obligation, but to look at what the aspirations were at the time the self-government agreement or treaty was reached. They're often about greater local decision-making. And they may be about greater economic development, more participation, resource development, and so on.
The main tool that gives me some confidence is that we have a clear set of guidelines for other federal departments, as well as our own officials, in terms of what the expectations are. We'll have a single-window database of what those obligations are. And we're doing a lot of training for federal officials who are involved in this. So I think the chances of things being dropped or forgotten in the rush of current work are much smaller than they used to be.
The spirit and intent was largely to develop their own governance capacity and to participate in the economic life of the country, and those are things that we should always keep in mind.