Yes, and again it is about bringing people together around these kinds of three-cornered architectures with the province.
The institution you're discussing has a long history. I know you're probably more familiar with it than I am. It has been a bit of a pitfall. Normally the federal government is not directly involved in the operating costs of the post-secondary institutions; that's just generally not what we do. The federal government's involvement has been through research councils, research grants, and student assistance directly to students and their families to help them participate in post-secondary education—and occasionally infrastructure. There was a dollop of Canada's economic action plan that did go to universities and colleges, which helped them deal with some of their backlog.
First nations institutions sit there somewhere in the middle. Provinces used to say, if this has something to do with first nations, you should go to see the feds. Then we would say, you're a post-secondary institution, and....
We've been trying to draw a line, saying that you should get accredited as an institution with the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada or get accredited with the Association of Colleges in Canada. We're not into funding private schools and religious schools and institutes. So they should meet the standards of accreditation, and we would then be in a better position to decide whether we should be getting involved with them or not.
It is my understanding—and you can correct me here—that this is where we were on FNTI and a couple of others. But our main tool is to actually help the students and their families.