Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to get some clarity with respect to the process for determining the mix of financial audits versus performance audits. It is pretty clearly understood in terms of cost. Performance audits are significantly more expensive, and in terms of ratio, it's 4:1 financial audits versus performance audits.
I'm looking at value for money. There's a part of me that says it would be nice to do 60 performance audits to 80 financial audits, as a ratio, because there is a part of me that thinks performance audits are much more valuable than financial audits.
Can you give me your thoughts on how you determine the ratio?