I'll take that question.
Yes, the results of our surveys have shown that we are a good place to work, that people like working with us.
This is a second analysis, obviously. If you are comparing it with how we are meeting percentages of representation, it's very much a function of hiring and of people who are leaving; and if we are approaching the right people, are we outreaching in areas in which we are weak in our recruitment activities?
In areas in which our hands are tied—and you'll find that the one area in which we have a little work to do, although we are doing well in all areas, is in membership of visible minorities—at a time of low recruitment it is difficult for us to fix the numbers, because we're not going out and hiring 20 or 30 students, as we might have in the past. That is one of our current struggles, although we were told by the Human Rights Commission, when they came to do an audit—I believe it was on these numbers—that we were actually a model organization.
So it partly is that people like to stay, that people enjoy the work and the challenge, but it's also that we are trying to be a very flexible organization. I think those are two key points.