You will also notice that I was very careful—at least I tried to be—in the instructions I was giving to our witnesses in terms of their response, that they would respond as best they could. I think I made a reference that hopefully Mr. Giguère would be happy. But you will see that it wasn't quite the same if it was a detailed question about something in the report. A vague response wouldn't suffice. In this case it's in that category.
Have I explained myself enough?