I hear your point and I share your thought, but I'm not convinced that Mr. Giguère is making the points that he's trying to make.
I've noted the issue, and unless and until Mr. Giguère is asking an unfair question of someone who doesn't have that report in front of them, I'm allowing Mr. Giguère some latitude to make his comments, as I do with all members. At the point at which it starts to be unfair—if he did make a reference in a question to a document that the witnesses don't have—then I would have to pull that back.
For now, I don't think he's gone beyond the latitude that is given to a member to make his statements. When it comes to the questions, though, they need to be fair, and not having information in front them is not fair. I would deal with that accordingly.
Mr. Albas.