I would expect that the analysts will continue to use the excellent discretion that they've been using.
I think that your time on this committee has shown that the statement is not over the top. I would also point out, of course, that it takes a majority of the committee to approve something in the final committee report. There's a double safeguard, if you will, from concerns.
We will stop the clock here for a moment.
I think your concern is with somebody having the ability to say something and skew the report when the statement didn't have any factual basis, in your opinion, in where we are, or relevancy.
Your point is well taken. However, we do need to buttress that against the right of members, particularly at committee, to have that wide latitude. I know you support that because I've given you that latitude. I do think we have the checks and balances, but it's always worth underscoring these things.
Thank you for your point. Are there any further interventions?
Hearing none, please start the clock.
Mr. Giguère, you have the floor again.