I commend you for demonstrating, in fact, that modest spending restraint can save millions of dollars without sacrificing program objectives and quality. We often hear a kind of post-apocalyptic version of the spending restraint that goes on in government as if it's going to devastate operations across the board, but I think your agency is proof positive that those two things can go hand in hand. I thank you for that.
I have one other area I want to delve into. I am frequently frustrated that Auditor General performance audits make recommendations without any mention of the cost to government departments of implementing those recommendations. I know that this is an interesting area of auditing practice.
How much more money would your department need in order to give Parliament the cost of the recommendations that you propose in your performance audits?