It was also noted in your report that this system is the SMS system, if I can to use the acronym that Mr. Lévesque quite competently outlined for us. I appreciate, Mr. Lévesque, that you explained the SMS earlier, so now we can use the acronym and don't have to keep saying it. I appreciate that.
The system had been around for about 15 years, and yet this audit, I would suggest to the department, is not the most pleasing one for them based on what you have seen inside here. It seems to me that your not knowing in a 15-year period whether you have personnel who actually can conduct SMS and whether you have the appropriate skill levels, and capacities, and competencies with those individuals isn't very reassuring for the general public.
What's your sense of where you think they need to take their competencies in the sense of, are there still deficiencies in your view inside of your audit?