As a matter of fact, for the excess moisture event, there were 227 days on average from start to finish, which is basically 30% less than the ten-and-a-half month target. That indicates to me that 86% of total payments were actually paid out in 30% less time than all payments. Then when we factor in disease, the majority of those were within 10% of the target. So those 10 events were paid out within 30 days of the target. When I look at this I see that 24 out of the 28 events were actually within the ten-and-a-half months. Some of them fell a little bit outside that ten-and-a-half months.
So the majority of these payments were made on time. Is that a correct statement?