I was going to say that the federal government has a fairly significant role in negotiating the framework with provinces and territories concerning the principles and criteria used in the context of AgriRecovery. As I said previously, it's a shared program, and there is agreement around the principles and basic criteria and the assessment process itself.
The assessment process is very much a shared assessment process, so while a province may trigger a request, the federal government and the province work quite closely in assessing the actual situation and identifying what if anything might need to be done in the context of the AgriRecovery framework. There is a set of principles that are reviewed in the context of that assessment, and both sides come to an agreement as to whether the situation is such that it warrants some level of initiative under the framework.
Both levels of government have to agree, because there are typically costs associated with the implementation of the initiative, and they are typically incremental to any existing budgets that departments might have. In both jurisdictions, you're having governments agree that yes, this is a situation that warrants the application of the framework and that yes, this is an initiative that should be pursued and funded.
So there is very much a role for the federal government in that respect. There is a similar role for an implicated province or territory as well.