Perhaps I can start and then turn it over to my colleague.
Mr. Chairman, the comment that was just raised is absolutely correct: we do have performance indicators that are linked directly to the AgriRecovery program, and those include the percentage of effective producers who apply for assistance once a disaster is designated. We have a target that 80% of producers expected to have been impacted directly by the disaster would have applied.
For the percentage of producers who believe that the financial assistance provided under the program played a role in the recovery, our target is that 75% of the producers surveyed would have indicated that in participating in the program.
We also have an indicator around response time to process applications from eligible producers in the affected areas. The target is that 90% of disaster situations be evaluated, as you well know, in this 45-day period and that 75% of the applications be processed within the nine months, which has really been the focus of our conversation today.
Then there is the percentage of producers still farming one year after the disaster payment. In that respect, the measurement target is that 70% of producers surveyed are still farming one year after the disaster payment.
This is a framework that we apply in the context of the AgriRecovery framework, and it's a significant tool that we use in terms of measuring the success of the program. But that said, we are working with our provinces and territorial colleagues to look at performance measures and to make sure that they are indeed relevant for the AgriRecovery framework and that we are applying them consistently across the board.
Rosser, do you want to add to that?