I appreciate your clarifying that.
The other part of it is, at the very end, that paragraph says, Mr. Smith, that in 2006 the data for 1% of the population was basically unavailable, but now we have a figure of 3%. Many folks would still say those are low numbers, 1% versus 3%, but statistically, is it not a significant statistical issue when you when you treble the number and go from the 1% to 3%, albeit both are small numbers?