Sure. On this side, at least, we're looking at evidence-based solutions, so it's good to know there's no evidence, or no significant evidence, in support of that.
On the question of the small population subgroups, for example, low-income earners, as I understand it from the Auditor General's report, your agency actually targeted its efforts following up with households that didn't initially complete their questionnaires based on geographic areas known to include relatively high proportions of certain of those subgroups, including low-income earners. You actually proactively went after that subgroup. Is that right?