Well, they play two roles, or more than two roles, actually. Some of the advisory committees are really committees of experts who are knowledgeable about such things as consumer price indexes or survey methods. We have an advisory committee on statistical methods composed of leading statisticians from around the world, particularly from the United States and Canada. That committee isn't designed to be representative of anything except experts who can advise us on our methods.
We have another committee on consumer price indexes, which is really of the same nature. Its principal purpose is to advise on methods, and it is populated by experts.
Other advisory committees on, for example, social issues are really there to advise us on the design of our programs, the design of specific surveys, and data gaps. That's a case in which, as the Auditor General has pointed out, we should have broad representation not only from academics, but also from the full range of users, including non-government organizations. Even businesses have some level of interest, as do municipal governments again.
That's fair commentary; they're not well represented in our advisory committees.