Okay.
The question that's like an earworm burrowing in there is that without the changes....
And I'm not questioning the validity of this in the sense of our deciding to do this in a certain way. That happens. We've seen this before at this committee. Accounting practices get changed from one to another. That's just the way it is.
But what difference would that have made to the specific deficits of those two years if you hadn't had to make this change? Is that a cumulative piece—in other words, you just simply make a straight subtraction? If you hadn't had to do that, it would obviously be less.