I want to talk about the global number here of $60 million. If you look back at the food mail program in 2009, I believe it was, the food mail program went over budget and it cost about $60 million. So here we are in 2014 and we're still only spending $60 million on a program that's equivalent to the food mail program. Obviously, you're not going to get the same results out of this program as you did out of the food mail program. The money isn't there.
On the other side of it, is it usual for a government subsidy program to be taking 10% for administration?