If I thought 90% was a better standard, that would be my opinion about what I think is the better standard. I'm not suggesting the department doesn't want to do 100%, Mr. Doiron, that's not what I'm suggesting at all. I understand you have to pick a number, you have to benchmark somewhere. My preference would be that you benchmark a little bit higher.
But I think Mr. Berthelette, in this particular chapter, you pointed out that although the department has said that 80% in the 16 weeks is their benchmark, for the actual client—and I will say patient in this particular case—who happens to be a veteran or a serving member, they don't see 16 weeks as being the outcome. Is that what you're telling me in page 9, at exhibit 3.4?