When we moved from food mail to nutrition north, it was very clear some communities weren't using food mail at all. The recommendation that was provided was that because some communities weren't needing it, and if you're basing it on need and fairness and you're looking at the cost of transportation as the primary consideration in what the subsidy should be, if they weren't using it then, why would they necessarily use it in the future?
We've discovered that when you make changes to any of these programs—the subsidy rate, the amount—there's a lot of interest. I think if we had made wholesale changes to the program at that point we would have had some issues. We wanted to see how it was working and developed. If you look to the future—as the Auditor General has pointed out—we need to look at how we manage it going forward.