Now I just have another question, Mr. Chair.
Member Bevington raised this. It seems from his line of questioning that he was almost articulating that somehow there is an inherent lack of fairness in how the program was structured. To me, I think he raised questions about why specific communities received a larger subsidy compared to ones that didn't, and to me, I think you answered that. A lot of it has to do with transportation costs, the accessibility, or whatnot.
There is a formula, and these things are taken very seriously, I'm sure, by the department. Is that correct?