Thank you very much for that question.
This was alluded to a little bit earlier as a very important issue generally. I might just point out, looking at the reports that the Auditor General selected to report on, that two of them do already have built into them aspects that touch on the need to scale appropriately for different-sized departments.
Bill mentioned earlier in his remarks that the department investment plan has been fine-tuned to ensure that small departments and agencies have less burden in the preparation of theirs, and as it's noted on the official languages annual review as well, it varies by entity and there are some particular accommodations made there; some report every three years and some every year. That process is already built in.
A lot more can be done, and it's been alluded to already in a couple of other questions about this particular burden.
Through the policy reset, all Treasury Board policies, not just their reporting requirements, but other aspects of risk mitigation that might be included in their requirements, are being put through a sieve, if I can put it that way. One of the things needs to be to ensure that the principle of proportionality is in play, that the requirements and the burden of complying with those requirements is proportionate to the risk, and where there's accommodation that needs to be made for small departments and agencies, that will be part of the challenge function in the renewal of the suite.