You're right in identifying a very important thing. I think the Auditor General defines it as a “reporting requirement that can be demonstrated to have served its intended purpose without unnecessary effort, burden, or duplication”. The word I'd underline is “unnecessary”. There's always going to be something that has to be done, and the art, if I can put it that way, is to make sure that you reduce, to a degree, and do only what is necessary and not what is unnecessary in driving that forward. That's the principle we're trying to bring into play.
The second important thing against that is it's not just the efficiency of the reporting that's important, but it's also the utility. You want to make sure you have a balance between the lowest cost required for that reporting for the highest value in the information that you get out. It's that relationship between not just cost, but cost and utility that we really want to work with in going forward.