If the objective is that important, explain one thing to me.
In theory, Registered Education Savings Plans were supposed to increase the number of university students. However, Canada Revenue Agency studies indicate that this is a total flop, that the plan has not increased the number of students in our universities, and that the people who benefit from it would in any case have paid for their children's higher education. However, this measure is renewed year after year, to the point where the objective of increasing the number of university students has been totally lost. It is simply a legal tax avoidance measure.
If the objective has absolutely not been reached according to your own analyses, why are you maintaining a measure that in fact increases financial iniquity?