I understand.
I believe the Auditor General selected eight tax-based expenditures and concluded that we evaluated four of them and didn't evaluate the other four.
I guess our position is that, in effect, we did evaluate seven of those measures and we provided information in relation to those measures in terms of how we did it. I think where we differ is whether or not there is a single document that evaluates that as opposed to whether we looked at all of the components over a period of time that would go into an evaluation.
I believe the measures that the report indicated that we didn't evaluate included the mineral exploration tax credit for flow-through shares. We provided documents, and again I stress—not a single document or evaluation, but documents that went to an evaluation, including an evaluation we published on flow-through shares, which explicitly accounted for the mineral exploration tax credit. The two measures are very closely related in that the mineral exploration tax credit builds on the flow-through share regime. That evaluation dealt with that.