In paragraph 5.20 of the Auditor General's report, he mentioned what's called the project management framework and then he talked about the service life cycle management framework. If I'm reading that correctly, it seems as though there was a change from one framework to the other. The reason for that change was to ensure that project prerequisites were met prior to moving on to the next phase, because the AG identified that as being an issue.
Can you explain a little about the service life cycle management framework? Has that addressed this concern with project prerequisites being met? Are they now being met? Can we say that with confidence?