Evidence of meeting #1 for Public Accounts in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Caroline Massicotte
Édison Roy-César  Committee Researcher

10 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Something to put in front of you for consideration is that after we meet with the Auditor General on Thursday, the normal practice is.... Sometimes it's that day, depending on how much time we have or thereafter. Anyway, there's an immediate process where we do two things.

One is to identify how many chapters we want to hold a public hearing on. That depends on a lot of factors and it will change from time to time. In the last Parliament, we did a minimum of four. It's a bit light by the way. We could do five, but four at a minimum. The question each time is how many we are going to do publicly and then the process for deciding.

Normally, and I'll throw it out while I have the floor, the practice was that the choices were made roughly by the ratio of seats. Therefore, if we did four, the government picked two chapters, the official opposition picked one, and the third party picked one.

10 a.m.

Liberal

Alexandra Mendes Liberal Brossard—Saint-Lambert, QC

Just to be clear, if there are five chapters, we get three.

10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Yes. This is all going to be worked out.

What Mr. Christopherson said earlier and what we need to bear in mind is that typically we work with consensus. When it comes to the different chapters of the Auditor General's report, we'll look at that. There will be some give and take. Some of it may go through a steering committee, it all comes back here to ratify what the steering committee says, and then we go on.

The meeting is adjourned.