It's a little frustrating.
I know that's not what we should base such important decision on, but this was something people who were using the bridge had spoken out about for several years. They were saying that the bridge was unreliable and that it was clearly deteriorating. Pieces of concrete were falling on cars. So something was not working.
Studies were conducted, but what was their credibility if, three years later, we realized that they were completely off? How can we trust those studies? What should we do to correct the way those studies are carried out?
The question is for Mr. Ferguson or Mr. Le Goff.