I mostly agree.
The comment on one nation versus many nations is a very significant and important one. They all have different situations. Let's put it that way. There are some remote communities. There are some communities that are close to urban centres. There are some communities that are bigger than others, that may have more capacity and so on. We have to take all this into account.
I don't think the system that we have in place is great from an accountability perspective, so the status quo is not a good accountability structure. They deliver programs that we developed most of the time, and it's not actually a good way of doing things. For us, part of the discussion is actually to make sure that we agree on who's responsible for what, but we're going to have to advance at the rhythm that the partner wants to advance on this; that's for sure. In some cases it would require a regional aspect, and in some cases it would be more local.
Paul is doing a lot of work on accountability with the AFN, and he may want to jump in.