Mr. Chair, this issue shows up in two places in our report. The first place is when we use it as an example to show data that is available within the department. Keep in mind this is data we've received when we mined the department's education system, and how it could have been used but wasn't used to improve program results. That's under paragraph 62 regarding the inadequate use of data.
We pointed out that the department had this information and despite these consistently poor results over a four-year period, we didn't see any evidence that there was any discussion to improve the outcome.
The other area where it comes up is in how information is reported. That's in paragraph 97. There we say that in fiscal year 2011-12, the department reported that 1,017 of these students were in transition to university. It really was that's how many students received the funds. There weren't a thousand students going to university.
Yes, over 4,000 over that four-year period received funds to support themselves, to prepare for going to post-secondary, but a very small percentage, about 8%, actually went. Over that period, although the department had the data, we didn't see any evidence of any attempt to make improvements, to find out what was going on.