My last question is this: Is this just an issue of denial, of not wanting to state that the effectiveness percentage of those programs is low, and therefore program directors are trying to find a number that shows a higher success rate, or is it specifically a problem with these types of programs?
I would be more satisfied knowing that an employment program had a 5% or a 10% success rate and knowing it's effectively helping 5% or 10% and is better than the last one, which had a 3% success rate.
Is this just a cultural problem of nobody wanting to admit that it's not a successful program?