Right. In your opinion, as it's laid out in paragraph 32 of report 3, you actually write: “purchasing interim aircraft does not bring National Defence closer to consistently meeting the new operational requirement introduced in 2016.” That almost reads like a recommendation. Why wasn't it?
Evidence of meeting #120 for Public Accounts in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was agency.
A video is available from Parliament.