That's why I made some reference to having some experience with command and control. I understand that, I respect it and I understand its necessity, but there was still an interface where the external review said, thou shalt set up an external body that will have these responsibilities: boom, boom, boom, boom. The military said no. Now when the Auditor General's report comes out, you're back to yes. I'm trying to determine what part of what you said no to disappeared so quickly once you got into some trouble.
By the way, I didn't say everything was horrible, and if I left that impression, I'm sorry. I want to go out of my way, and I think I did, to say that you're doing some things very well and we're impressed with that, but this isn't a cheerleading meeting. This is a meeting about fixing things. Tell me about that interface. How was it that what you just said held, and left them out of the loop, and then all the problems the AG found came from the areas you didn't give them the responsibility for, which you said you would do when you accepted the external review, I might add?
I'm sorry, you're still not giving me exactly the answer I'm looking for, sir.