Okay.
If I may, I will read from page 9 of the report:
For 19 of the 50 offender files examined (nearly 40%), we found that parole officers did not fully monitor offenders as required.
Now, you've said that you accept the findings of the Auditor General, yet I get a sense of defensiveness around this from you, Commissioner.
Do you accept this finding, that 40% are not being monitored as required? Are the requirements not correct? Should they be modified?
If all these other various forms of monitoring that you've spoken of are sufficient, why is the Auditor General saying that in 40% of cases they're not being monitored as required?