I'm glad you brought that up. I think the Auditor General looked at all the heritage buildings in total, not the different classes that are there. If I'm not wrong, this policy on management of real property was last revised in 2006. I don't think that in 2006 they changed the definition or the criteria that have to be followed to designate any property as heritage.
Two of you, I think, did mention that you don't prioritize conservation over operations. I fully agree with that because operations are much more important. Maybe all of you can give inputs into the revisions that are taking place with the Treasury Board. I think we have to use the money more on the operations, in my view, than on conservation.