As was noted, the designation—in fact, all the management of infrastructures being reviewed by Treasury Board.... As the public accounts committee, you are aware that infrastructure is grossly underfunded and perhaps a problem across all departments. So, it is being reviewed to look at how we can consolidate, have departments share infrastructure, etc., rather than building new.
That said, the designation.... At 40 years old, an asset is often quite young in our portfolio. But there are multiple things that have to be considered, including its historic value. A headquarters building on a base that was built in 1950 probably isn't a historic building. It's just an older building. In our portfolio, it's in fact quite young. I think the policy could be reviewed, and is being reviewed. I think there are elements of it that need to be considered. As was stated, 40 years of use of a building is not really that significant in a lifespan, especially with new construction.