Thank you.
Maybe I'll switch now and talk about the whole business of designation in the first place. It was mentioned in the report, “We found that the federal government focused primarily on designating heritage properties, rather than conserving them.”
That statement, I'm sure, is troubling to Canadians who would ask what the point is of designating something, other than just to allow for a photo op, and perhaps to allow people to feel good for a moment about the designation of something. When each day goes by and preservation doesn't occur until you wake up one day with a falling-apart building with a designation attached to it, that's really of no benefit to any Canadian.
How are we going to address this, where we connect the actual need to preserve with a designation?
I guess that's probably a question for Parks Canada.