I did hear that money was a major concern, as has been reiterated by Mr. Christopherson. I just want to read paragraph 2.76 again, in the conclusion of this report:
We concluded that Parks Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada and National Defence did not work sufficiently to conserve the heritage value and extend the physical life of federal heritage properties. They did not have a full picture of their heritage properties; for example, information on the condition of their heritage properties was not current.
What is the solution here? It might be a rhetorical question, but I'm trying to figure it out here. They're working hard to catch up with having an understanding of what properties are under their department. Simultaneously, they're the ones responsible. This problem has been looked at since 2003, with the first report, the 2007 report and now this report. It just feels like déjà vu.