Thank you for the question.
As I said in my opening remarks, we looked at the sample the Auditor General pulled to assure ourselves that the criminality had been dealt with. It's clear to me that in every instance when someone was making their asylum claim, the officer was aware of the criminality at play at that point in time.
I should point out that criminality can occur before or after they arrive in Canada, but before they go to a hearing. When they came in, there may have been no criminality at play. While they were waiting for whatever period of time before the IRB hearing, they had a DUI or committed some other kind of criminal offence. That was always at the surface to us, because we do the screening process right up until the IRB hearing to assure ourselves that anything that happened while they were in Canada is accounted for when the decision-maker reviews the file.