I would also point out to my colleague that it was the Auditor General who said specifically that cybersecurity couldn't be afforded to be done. If the government wants to challenge the legitimacy of what the Auditor General is saying, I am more than willing to agree that we bring the Auditor General back in, in front of the cameras, and let's have it out.
I'd love that. If that's what the committee would like to do to get to the bottom of it, if the government believes that the funding is adequate and that this is consistent with the way governments have treated the Auditor General before, if the government members actually believe that as strongly as I believe the opposite, let's bring the Auditor General in front of cameras, and let's have at it.
I'm open to a Simms protocol response to that.
Let's get the Auditor General in here. If you want to not deal with debate and deal with facts, let's bring him in.
Are the government members open to that?