In terms of any of the changes that have been made, I think the Auditor General has pointed out the extent to which the documentation on the files has perhaps not described all of this. But any of the changes that have taken place, in terms of risk indicators and risk criteria, are based on the input by and the work done by our own officers, together with input we received from CBSA, the RCMP, and also from our judges, who are on the front lines and who do residence hearings, based on what they have observed and identified, in terms of the kinds of issues that have arisen.
The changes that have been made to the system were based on that kind process where there has been input from those closest to these matters. Whether or not we have document that, clearly is a gap that has not yet been filled. That is the work we doing in updating our risk indicators. We're evaluating them and putting in place a more rigorously documented process.