You're right, except—hang on, John, hang on—every now and then there's an audit that comes along where somebody needs to say that with one exception, this is a pretty good audit. I had to get to page 13 before there was a recommendation. What I'd run into twice before then was that we made no recommendations in this area of examination. When there are no recommendations, that tells me a lot as a member of this committee. So I think it behooves me to say that, on balance, if everybody's audit came in roughly where this one was, a lot of the work that we do would be in the past. We would have achieved what our ultimate goal is, which is to change behaviour so that people follow the rules, are focused on following the right procedures and making sure that all those pesky little boxes are actually ticked, that there's a reason for them.
I'm going to go to an area that's a bit problematic, but it won't be my usual style because it's not deserved. I want to compliment all of you on what I would say is a relatively good audit. I would hold you up as an example to the rest of the government on a lot of key areas, in terms of the things that you got right.
Today's one of those days, Chair, where man bites dog and I'm complimenting the former Conservative government—and I give the Conservatives their due—that this was not a bad audit, given some of the nightmares we've seen come across our table. So thank you very much for the job that you did. These kinds of compliments don't come very often from me, so if that's worth anything at all to you, hold it close because it's sincere and heartfelt. It's a good audit, not a bad audit, and I wish we could see more of these.
Having said that, I don't have too much time. In fact, how much time do I have left, Chair?