If I may, though, BDC got its money through a public offering to the Government of Canada for this initiative. Basically, it sold more shares to the Government of Canada, right? Is that a summary?
The Government of Canada had to take $400 million from somewhere. Now, you might currently account for that as an accounts receivable or say that the government has an increased asset in its share of BDC, but the bottom line is that $400 million is here, so it cannot be there. It came from somewhere. We know that.
What I'm asking is, in your doing this analysis, are you treating the $400 million as though it was created from scratch? Or are you treating it as though it was displaced, it was moved, it was taken.... It was either borrowed out of the economy or taxed out of the economy, but one way or another, it was taken away from some other place and some other use. Therefore, there is an opportunity cost. Are you considering that in your full analysis of the success or failure of this initiative?